Showing posts with label matt smith. Show all posts
Showing posts with label matt smith. Show all posts

++CHARLIE BROOKER IS REQUIRED++BRING HIM HERE


Some as-it-happened reactions to what at the time was the start of the most recent series of Doctor Who, and the most recent series of Black Mirror, and the tedium-merchants who were attempting to link the two for no good reason...

Well, I had decided that I was more or less done with writing reviews of new episodes of Doctor Who. Not for any indignant or loftily 'artistic' reason, but because I'd pretty much run out of anything to say. It's a lot more difficult to get a critical crowbar into the more streamlined revived series than it is with the original run, there's not really any scope for examining the context - which is what I really enjoy when writing about old stuff - and, let's be honest, there's more than enough other people reviewing them already. After a couple of years' worth of causing minor furores by liking The Idiot's Lantern or disliking Silence In The Library, occasionally hitting the nail on the head, and penning an epic length overview of the entire Russell T. Davies era (which you can now find in Well At Least It's Free; it's longer and better than the version originally published online, too), I felt that I no longer had anything constructive or worthwhile to add, and in fact my most recent review to date - of The Doctor's Wife - used that very problem as its starting point. Well that and crisps.

Anyway, let the eating of hats in Astrakhan fur (or, if raining, Stovepipe) commence - last Saturday's new episode, The Bells Of St. John, turned out to have some things worth saying about it after all. Speaking as someone who on the whole hasn't really enjoyed the last couple of series as much, and never really got on with Amy, Rory, overcomplicated 'story arcs' or huge swathes of screentime given over to sub-Soap Opera emoting at the expense of any actual appearances by The Doctor, it was a real breath of fresh air to see an episode that just got right on with telling a straightforward story really well. More pleasingly still, given my tendency to rationalise any misgivings over the new series by reminding myself that it's not being made with me in mind as it's not black and white and from 1966, it seemed to have drawn a lot of inspiration and energy from mid-sixties Doctor Who, with stylistic and structural nods to stories like The Faceless Ones and the internet-predicting The War Machines, not just in revisiting the the era's fixation with the misuse of new technology, but even down to the pacing of the scenes featuring The Doctor and Clara 'meeting' the public. Yes, maybe the actual technological detail was all over the place, but frankly you can forgive that of a series that once gave us The Megabyte Modem and The Icecano. In short, this is what happens when Steven Moffat uses the influence of the past to forge something new, and on this evidence that's something he should be doing a lot more of.

This is why it was more than a little tiresome to see so many people - from newspaper columnists to the one-shot instant opinionators who cause Twitter to creak under their weight the second the end credits roll - talking about how the episode was clearly influenced by Black Mirror, in most cases going on to say more about that than about Doctor Who itself. Leaving aside the presumably trivial detail that this episode was in production several months before the second series of Black Mirror even aired, this kind of reductionism is on a par with the seemingly inexhaustible supply of contestants on Pointless who won't even guess at a Rolling Stones song title because "it's before my time". Though you can go too far in the other direction, and end up like Simon Pegg did when he got shirty at people saying one of his films was based on an existing film and sulked that he'd actually based it on the the book that the original film was based on and then got the title of the book wrong, automatically assuming that something must have been based on whatever is nearest to recognitive hand is selling both yourself and whatever it is you're professing to like short. Perhaps Black Mirror was on Steven Moffat's list of Things To Mention In The Tone Meeting - though the animal sex whimsy/decade-out-of-date argument about reality TV/shameless attempt to rewrite Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind content was decidedly thin on the ground - but judging from his previous form it would have been about seventeenth on a list that also included some things Black Mirror had in turn drawn influence from and, well, Doctor Who itself.

All of which you're probably now thinking is a very long preamble to just going on yet again about how people should go and watch some black and white Doctor Who. Well, it isn't. But I don't have a proper ending, so go and watch some black and white Doctor Who. And then go on about how it's all just ripping off Not So Much A Programme More A Way Of Life...


You can find my huge piece on the entire Russell T. Davies era of Doctor Who in my book Well At Least It's Free, available as a paperback here or as an eBook here.

I Get So Emotional Baby/Every Time I Think Of Who


By Matt Smith's third series of Doctor Who, I really was fed up...

This Saturday – as you might have noticed from the one or two people casually mentioning it in passing on Twitter [SATIRES] – Doctor Who is back, back, back, for a new series of adventures ahead of a mega-hyped fiftieth anniversary special. An occasion that is somewhat slightly daunting for those of us who sat through Keff McCulloch’s interminable The Brain on The Doctor Who 25th Anniversary Album.

While the big whizzbang repeats-ahoy anniversary hoedown won’t really hit until November, and you won’t be seeing any Distinguished Service Order for David J. Howe or street parades with giant inflatable Voord and Ray Cusicks just yet, it’s a fair bet that quite a few people will choose to mark the occasion with a rewatch of that first ever episode, with its celebrated eerie schoolroom/junkyard shenanigans, pioneering use of electronic music and video effects, Kenneth Williams-faced extras, and teenagers handjiving to the most unreasonable non-copyright Shadows facsimilie imaginable. If any of them then venture on to the second ever episode, they’ll witness a wonderful moment where William Hartnell – one of the finest actors ever to grace the small screen, and don’t you listen to any of that twaddle about him getting lines wrong all the time (which was probably largely deliberate anyway) – steps outside the Tardis and suddenly looks deeply concerned, muttering to himself “it’s still a Police Box… why hasn’t it changed?”. And that, really, was about as close as old-skool Doctor Who got to an emotional outpouring for, well, pretty much most of its screentime.

Sceptical? Well, look at a couple of the other big ‘event’ episodes of the sixties. When William Hartnell regenerates into Patrick Troughton, do his two young companions – whom it’s already been established have some sort of a relationship (they did meet The Doctor while they were on a date, after all) – use this as an opportunity to have an impassioned debate about how this might affect what schools their theoretical children get into? No, they spend the lion’s share of an entire episode spluttering about whether they really just saw that happen and speculating on whether this decidedly more ‘Chaplinesque’ figure might be an imposter who’s imprisoned the Real Doctor somewhere. And when it’s time to say goodbye in turn to the second Doctor, and his slightly newer two young companions have their memories of him erased by the Time Lords, are there any lingering close-ups of tears being fought back or emotionally overwrought speeches that overstay their welcome? No there certainly aren’t, and what really resonates for the viewer is The Doctor spinning away into the centre of the screen, still arguing with his accusers as he goes. And it didn’t end with the final black and white episode either – yes, throughout the entire existence of Doctor Who, there have been emotional moments, but they have always been just that – moments. Nobody could argue about the punch-packing impact of, say, the end of The Caves Of Androzani, the end of The Green Death, or even the end of Doomsday for that matter, but they’ve always been short, concise and heavy on impact; sometimes, in fact, even largely wordless.

Nowadays, however, you’re more likely to see episodes largely given over to the companions blubbing like an X Factor contestant relating their ‘journey’, and going ‘O Tempora, O Mores’ about a Judoon falling over or something, while the actual title character seems to be getting smaller and smaller amounts of screen time, and even then usually joins in with the sobbing too. Consult the average review of any recent episode, and chances are you will find the word ‘emotional’ being used before long, which suggests that a lot of people actually enjoy the bawl-friendly bias. Well, if you do like it, good for you, but what about the rest of us who fail to see what’s so wrong exactly about a man chasing some monsters (which, lest we forget, is exactly how the revived series started)? It’s no wonder they brought Primeval back.

So yes, this new run of episodes. By all means let’s still have ‘emotional’ bits, but please can we have a bit of balance back too, before we end up with the sodding Weeping Angels ‘sharing’ their ‘story’ with Heat


You can find my huge piece on the entire Russell T. Davies era of Doctor Who in my book Well At Least It's Free, available as a paperback here or as an eBook here.

Doctor Who And The Night Terrors

The last of the actual Doctor Who reviews - though there's a couple of Who-related pieces still to come - and originally puntastically titled 'Dolly Part-One (Of One)', this review of Night Terrors was done pretty much as a favour for a fanzine editor, as by that point I'd long since started to tire of reviewing 'new' Doctor Who. It wasn't just that, on the whole, I hadn't been enjoying it as much since Steven Moffat took over as showrunner, but also that the revived series is so streamlined that it's difficult to get any sort of a critical angle on it, either positively or negatively, and the amount of effort required to find something vaguely original and cliche-free to say about it was starting to feel like more effort than it was worth; indeed, I had earlier discussed that very point at some length in another review (which will also be appearing on here in due course). It was also - and as you'll see this did inform the review to an extent - a fairly turbulent time in general, and this would feed in to my overall reaction to it in quite an unexpected way. If truth be told I did actually quite enjoy Night Terrors, without thinking it was anywhere near up there with the best of the revived series nor indeed Mark Gatiss' own previous contributions, but the fact that I'd named the original file 'whogatissyawn' perhaps reveals a lot about how I was feeling regarding the idea of actually having to review it. As a result, I was probably a bit harsher on this perfectly decent episode than I should have been, but you have to look at it in context; leaping up and down with excitement over it being, well, perfectly decent would have been like holding a street party to celebrate one of the later Suede albums having a halfway hummable song on it. But that said, there are much more important battles to fight. Like the one against Jimmy McGovern's views about TV drama ever being taken seriously by anyone...


What a difference a short mid-season break makes. Only a couple of weeks ago, this writer was happily enthusing about how the revived Doctor Who is at its best when it's like Sizzlin' Bacon Monster Munch or something. Now it's time to review another episode, and in between, the world seems to have gone completely mad. 'Hackgate', rioting, some pillock throwing a sausage on a fork at Alan Sugar... the bewildering summer of 2011 was like an entire decade's worth of jaw-dropping news stories crammed into a handful of days, and it's something of a relief to find the apparent return to normality accompanied by the return of your favourite Saturday evening sci-fi silliness. Except that Primeval isn't actually back on yet.

Following unenviably on the heels of Let's Kill Hitler - forty interminable minutes of 'answers' to questions nobody asked - the promisingly-titled Night Terrors is, mercifully, a return to standalone storytelling. Written by the reliable Mark Gatiss, it takes place in a run-down block of flats where an unnaturally preturbed eight-year-old boy lives in fear of some indefinable thingymajig that's supposedly hiding in his cupboard. Well, given that today's youngsters are no longer troubled by Armchair Thriller, Test Card F or that Public Information Film about retrieving frisbees from substations, they presumably have to make their own 'entertainment'. So powerful is this overwhelming fear that his cries for help show up on the Psychic Paper, causing The Doctor, Amy and Basil From The Magic Roundabout to intervene and inevitably run into more than they'd bargained for, including some creepy walking doll's house residents that look unnervingly like they've escaped from late eighties video rental shop favourite Dolls ("...they want to play with you!").

This, you have to admit, is a pretty exciting premise. Unfortunately, something seems to have got very badly lost in translation and what ended up on screen was a strange combination of a script that worked, and a directorial approach that worked, but which for some reason didn't seem to work very well together. It looked fantastic, but in a way that didn't really do justice to the subtleties and nuances of the script, which in turn seemed to have been written with a more traditional style in mind (or, at least, something more akin to episodes like Midnight), and found it hard to rise to the challenge of what should have been enjoyably bombastic direction. Appropriately enough, it called to mind a modern big-budget horror director working from a thirties Universal Films script, and as a result just didn't deliver the edge-of-the-seat thrills that both in their own way should have brought to the table. The disparity between the script and the direction meant that the hefty debt to two separate Sapphire & Steel stories - something of a jarringly recurring theme in the Moffat era- was perhaps not quite as subtly concealed as it should have been, and adding to the overall underwhelmingness, there were a number of puzzlingly context-free apparent eighties references in the design and direction that felt like a pointer towards a plot detail that never actually came.


Meanwhile, Matt Smith aside, the cast didn't really seem like they were that enthusiastic about having to make the episode, which hardly helped. Amy and Rory's sudden apparent lack of interest in their previously all-important abducted offspring (yes, alright, so the episode was filmed earlier and held back, but the general viewing public don't know this, and anyway it's the sort of thing that the production team are supposed to notice and address in, say, that 'post-production' thingy they spend eight years banging on about in Doctor Who Confidential every Saturday night) would also be worth frowning over, if it wasn't for the mitigating fact we're going to get an episode almost entirely free of the increasingly ditchwater-aping 'story arc'. Or at least until that cringeworthy "he went to bed with a bucket on his head/sit ubu sit" bit tacked onto the end, which serves mainly to prove that they've still learned nothing about how to do this sort of thing with a bit of wit and subtlety. Like That Bloody Crack in the previous run, it's shoehorned in more annoyingly - and less purposefully - than any animated Graham Norton.

Apparently, so 'fan wisdom' has it, we're supposed to regard these pesky standalone episodes as something akin to when The Smiths used to throw in a bit of (Marie's The Name) His Latest Flame at the start of live versions of Rusholme Ruffians; a nice novelty but now can we get on with the more serious business of the ongoing something or other etc etc. This is an incredibly misguided approach, and not just because the arc-heavy episodes are more Golden Lights than Rushholme Ruffians (and if you don't get that analogy, go and buy a couple of Smiths albums and listen to them instead of rewatching Let's Forget We Even Mentioned Hitler for the eighty seventh time). The 'fans' might well be happy with their unfolding narrative about something where nobody's quite sure what it actually is, but all it means to the casual viewer is a load of episodes weighed down with backgroundy plot points that it's neither reasonable nor fair to expect them to be able to follow or even care about on a casual basis. And they're not alone - it seems that, increasingly, a good proportion of those selfsame 'fans' who are supposed to regard River Song as the best thing since sliced Dwarf Mordant are expressing boredom with the arc and a desire that Doctor Who would just go back to what it does best. Ignore this if you must, but don't come crying to me when it's got so bad that everyone's pining for the golden days of a standalone story about a talking cactus.


Jimmy McGovern, in one of his trademark cheerful and constructive observations, recently commented that viewers need more drama that 'matters', singling out Doctor Who as a prominent example of drama that doesn't 'matter'. This is - in the words of an ancient Doctor Who story that certainly doesn't 'matter' but still urinates all over The Lakes from a massive height - arrant nonsense. As turbulent recent real life events have underlined, viewers want - and indeed need - to be entertained rather than lectured to. By all means throw in a bit of a message if you want, just remember that you can still make it entertaining. Whether you're looking to make the next Threads or looking to make the next B.A.D. Boyes, you're still making it for an audience who have enough 'serious' business to deal with in their real day-to-day lives and simply want to lose themselves in even the most hard-hitting and realistic of small-screen entertainment. And, while it's got absolutely nothing to do with Doctor Who itself, you'd be hard pushed to find a drama that 'matters' less than The Singing Detective. Chew on that for a while, 'Jimmy'.

Doctor Who is, erm, to do with Doctor Who itself, and if it wants to 'matter' as drama that doesn't 'matter', then it has to make sure that it's providing something for everyone and not just a hardcore - no matter how big it is - of followers who'd watch it even if it was just forty minutes of Steven Moffat chasing a wheel down a street (actually, that does sound like it would be quite good). In previous series, Night Terrors would have been the one that was quite good but didn't quite work - here, albeit for very different reasons, it's the most exciting one by far, and a pointer to what the series should really be doing whether it doesn't quite work or not. And anyway, you'd think that after the fudged ending of Lost and the freefall disappearance of Heroes into ratings oblivion, the message about overburdening hit shows with story arcs might have got through. So, this marks the end of the Sizzlin' Bacon review 'arc', and now in return let's have less River Song et al please. Deal?





If you're now feeling sufficiently defensive of Steven Moffat-era Doctor Who to want to hear me and writer Stephen O'Brien talking more favourably about one of his earlier sitcoms, then you can find that here.



You can find my huge piece on the entire Russell T. Davies era of Doctor Who in my book Well At Least It's Free, available as a paperback here or from the Kindle Store here.

Doctor Who And The Doctor's Wife

Another of those Doctor Who reviews, and we're into the first couple of episodes of Series 6a or whatever it is we're calling it now. Thankfully, I once again ended up with the standout episode of the run to review, though more through my insistence on reviewing 'the Neil Gaiman one' than any fluke of good fortune. Yet despite really, really enjoying it, I was by now rapidly running out of anything worthwhile to say about a series that had become the sort of thing that I'm perhaps not really suited to reviewing, and that lack of anything new to say was basically the starting point of what was originally called Fix Idris, yet another Super Furry Animals-related gag that nobody got...


It's never a good feeling when you find yourself suddenly less interested in something you've previously been near-obsessive about. Not exactly actively disliking it, and certainly not turning against it, just feeling that it's taken a direction that's really not for you, and that while you still wish it well, you just can't get excited about it any more. Like when Suede released Head Music, when Monster Munch discontinued the Sizzlin' Bacon flavour, and when Vic Reeves did... well, anything after Big Night Out really.

Given its long and varied history, chances are that if you're a Doctor Who fan, you'll have felt this way at one time or another. There've been unpopular Doctors, unpopular production teams, even unpopular programme logos, and that's not even getting started on the sheer number of tedious, incomprehensible or just plain mean-spirited stories that were almost enough to put people off watching ever again by themselves. Of course every fan will have their own experiences of this, and – in a revelation that will doubtless cause many to stop reading in indignance – this reviewer is having just such an experience right now. For whatever reason (though bloody River Song clearly has a lot to do with it), the rather low-key approach and proliferation of ‘slow reveal’ story arcs just don’t seem to hold the same sort of personal appeal as the more grandstanding and in-your-face Russell T. Davies era did, to the extent that rewatching the four-decade-old black and white The War Games on DVD was actually a more exciting and enjoyable experience than first-watching the previous series. If anything, the first three episodes of this run have been even more convoluted and meandering still, which is why it was so satisfying to have The Doctor’s Wife as a timely reminder of exactly why it’s always worth persevering with Doctor Who.

With no small irony, it had already been revealed in a pre-transmission ‘teaser’ (not ‘spoiler’, goodness no) that the episode would open with ‘something we haven’t seen since episode ten of The War Games’. Sadly this wasn’t one of the ‘incredible bunch’ of faces that the Time Lords ask the Second Doctor to choose from, but the Maths In A Box-esque psychic cube thingymajig that they use to send distress signals to each other – a fitting start for an episode that was both akin to an unexpected message of hope beaming out from nowhere, and indeed almost as enjoyable as The War Games. Said cube contains a distress signal supposedly sent by a fellow renegade Time Lord named ‘The Corsair’ (presumably after the sixteenth-century buccaneers rather than the doo-wop hitmakers), though happily nobody saw fit to make a charity single about his predicament. This leads The Doctor and his two inconsistently-scripted chums to what appears to be the home planet of forgotten cheapo eighties animated robots CP & Qwikstitch, but is in fact a sentient asteroid situated just outside the universe, which lures unwary Time Lords onto its surface so it can subsume the energy from their Tardises, and goes by the name of ‘House’.


‘House’ may share its name with Hugh Laurie’s Vicodin-addicted maverick surgeon (whose sidekick Taub, incidentally, has recently expressed a preference for ‘Classic Doctor Who’), but not his mastery of diagnostic lateral thinking, meaning that it remains oblivious to the Doctor’s Tardis – which, lest we forget, the makers of the seventies Doctor Who Top Trumps cards thought had a‘mental ability’ of ‘nil’ – having the presence of mind to implant itself mentally into one of the asteroid’s hapless inhabitants. It's always been implied that everyone's favourite bigger-on-the-inside time machine was possessed of some degree of intelligence and capacity for independent thought, and here we finally get some evidence of that as the Tardis takes on the bigger-on-the-outside form of Suranne Jones, who would be easy to dismiss as stunt-casting designed to get the more 'feverish' fans thinking "phwoar, wouldn't mind giving her Ormulu Clock a good winding up" if she wasn't so unexpectedly good in the role, playing with just the right combination of smugness, flirtiness and scatterbrained scientific genius. Yes, this – confounding months of increasingly ridiculous and unrealistic speculation – is the Doctor’s‘wife’. It’s a simple yet effective idea that fits so well that it’s hard to believe nobody had ever thought of it until now.

Michael Sheen was a little less impressive. Given a rare opportunity to do something other than play one of a series of recent-history figures who all apparently had the same face, he didn’t really manage to do as much with House’s voice as might have been expected (or indeed had been anticipated), lapsing into the usual ‘booming malevolence’ default setting when something a touch more detached and sinister (and indeed indicative of House’s non-Universal origins) would have been more appropriate. In fact, it wasn’t even as frightening as that French bloke staring into the camera on The Eurovision Song Contest later that evening. Disagree if you must, but it’s impossible to avoid the conclusion that he’s only going to end up on the long list of out-of-vision Doctor Who actors who weren’t Gabriel Woolf and his ‘sibilant’voice.


Meanwhile – and this is supposed to be a positive review, believe it or not – Amy and Rory yet again proved to be the most forgettable aspect of the entire episode, with their spectacular lack of depth giving the already rather tedious chase around the Tardis corridors an unpersonal air that left the entire sequence feeling as though it would have been more comfortable in an episode of Space: 1999. The lack of ‘other’ Tardis rooms didn’t exactly help, and the inclusion of yet another false death for Rory must have left most sane viewers having to be physically restrained from throwing large and heavy objects at their television in lieu of actually being able to throw them at the production team. True, this is hardly Neil Gaiman’s fault, and it did work in the context of the episode, but this is one time too many on top of one time too many and it’s worth pointing out that Heroes, a series that was more or less run out of television town for featuring fake deaths, actually only ever featured one. Matt Smith, on the other hand, rises to the challenge of what is a rather offbeat storyline admirably, particularly in his alternately witty and tender exchanges with the ‘Tardis’, and his glee at cobbling together a new console room out of old wrecked bits of scrap. Though just imagine how much more effective that “fear me – I’ve killed all of them” line would have been if it hadn’t been featured in approximately thirteen million pre-transmission trailers.

More pertinently, though again less of a direct criticism of this episode, there’s the recurring problem of the post-Russell T. Davies era seemingly being unable to convey the sense that there’s an entire universe beyond the three leads and the handful of people they encounter each episode. Yes, technically this one was set ‘outside’ the universe and mostly given over to literally four characters and a voice, and as such this was an appropriate atmosphere, but it’s hard to shake the feeling that this was a happy accident rather than design. While it’s something of a relief not to have to endure any more shots of everyone running out of their houses to look at the sky and news reports by Trinity Wells, it is possible to go too far in the other direction and end up with, say, seemingly nobody else in the world being bothered that subterranean reptiles had infiltrated a high profile experimental drilling programme. Given that other prominent examples of this problem include such big-hitting ratings winners as Volume 3 of Heroes (yes, alright, the one with the fake death) and the big-screen remake of The Avengers, it’s fairly safe to say that this is a problem that needs addressing pretty sharpish.

By now you’re probably thinking that this is all rather nitpicky for a supposedly positive review, and, well, you’re absolutely right. That’s kind of the point. Everything is so streamlined now, especially in this post-RTD era, that it’s hard to get a spanner into really good episodes and say what made them really good without resorting to generalisms, cliches and good old fashioned repeating yourself, let alone finding something to say that hasn’t already been said by every other reviewer; negative points, however, are as easy to seize on and hold up to ridicule as ever. In all seriousness, you can get five times as many words as this out of saying you actually quite like The Underwater Menace, and yet struggle to bring this review up to a decent length. Which is probably why the original attempt at it was full of ill-fitting references to Craig Gannon’s guitar playing on the live version of Rusholme Ruffians – because, well, you have to say something. So, one single decent episode brings home the Sizzlin’ Bacon and suddenly I’m hooked again. But it’s so difficult to say exactly why.





If you're now feeling sufficiently defensive of Steven Moffat-era Doctor Who to want to hear me and writer Stephen O'Brien talking more favourably about one of his earlier sitcoms, then you can find that here.



You can find my huge piece on the entire Russell T. Davies era of Doctor Who in my book Well At Least It's Free, available as a paperback here or from the Kindle Store here.

Doctor Who And The Amy's Choice

As I didn't review any of the final set of David Tennant 'specials' - preferring instead to do a giant overview of the revived series so far, which you can find in my earlier book Well At Least It's Free - we're jumping ahead to Matt Smith's first series, when I suddenly found myself not quite so keen on the show, but as luck would have it wound up with the single best episode of the series to review. Well, actually, I pretty much insisted on getting that one once I found out Simon Nye was writing it. This also meant that I was able to write it as much from the perspective of a Simon Nye fan as a Doctor Who fan, which at least gave me something fairly original to say. This is the first time the review - originally titled Amy, Amy, Give Me Your Answer Do - has appeared in full, as it was originally trimmed without my input to accomodate a giant header, rendering some jokes that appeared later on in it completely unintelligible, and also making it look uncomfortably as though a tongue-in-cheek point was being presented entirely seriously. On top of that, some praise for Rory that I certainly didn't write was shoved in under the radar. Anyway, look on that version as the 'alternate reality' Amy, while this is the bona fide real deal genuine article Karen Gillan...


Alternate realities - they're all the rage at the moment, aren't they? From Heroes and its obsession with 'dark' potential futures in which everyone has slightly different hair, to Lost's excursion into a parallel timeline where nothing happens, to Life On Mars/Ashes To Ashes in general - not to mention that episode of Futurama where Zoidberg met a blue Zoidberg - it seems that you just can't move for What If?s and rifts in time. And now it's Doctor Who's turn. No, not to meddle with its own past and try and create an alternate reality where Meglos didn't happen, but to adapt this currently all-too-familiar plot device for its own purposes.

In a sense, this new series is in something of an alternate reality where everything's the same but very slightly different itself. While the ever-tedious 'RTD MUST GO!' brigade promised all and sundry that a change of producer would lead to a new golden age of quality drama and pan-global Psychic Paper-derived sociocultural harmony, the uncomfortable truth that few seem to want to admit is that what we've ended up with is essentially more of the same, only with slightly less 'must watch' razzle-dazzle, slightly less punch-packing pre-credits sequences, and a somewhat more than slightly less tolerable theme music arrangement. Not that this is in any sense a bad thing, though - if you're going to be similar to something in present day television, then you can't get much higher a watermark than the revived Doctor Who, and even despite two episodes not actually appearing to have a storyline, a trend towards jarring sub-Sendhil Ramamurthy closing voiceovers, that bloody crack being signposted with all the subtlety of Who Hell He? from Vic Reeves' Big Night Out, and the keenly unanticipated return of River Song, it's been a mostly good run so far. And right in the middle came this episode that seemingly nobody was that bothered about.

For the benefit of those who had never heard of him before - which, judging by the amount of Doctor Who fans that tiresomely treat the show as some sort of career high for anyone involved and refuse to tolerate the idea of there having been any other television shows ever, will be a fair number - Simon Nye is a highly successful comedy writer who broke into television when his novel Men Behaving Badly was adapted into a sitcom by ITV. Nye became something of a legend within the industry when ITV cancelled the fledgeling sitcom despite it picking up a sizeable audience and several awards, causing him and Hartswood Films to perform an airlift over to the BBC, where it became one of the biggest successes of the nineties. Since then, he's been responsible for a number of entertaining and well above average sitcoms, including Is It Legal?, Beast, Hardware, Wild West (starring a then-unknown Catherine Tate), Carrie & Barry, and a surprisingly not-as-bad-as-people-were-not-unreasonably-fearing sort-of revival of Reggie Perrin, and has become notorious for his shows almost always being inexplicably cancelled after the second series despite good viewing figures. Along the way he's written the odd drama series too, most notably the popular Frank Stubbs Promotes, but is much better known as a comedy writer which made it all the more surprising to see his name amongst Steven Moffat's list of potential Doctor Who scribes; although perhaps not quite so surprising when you consider that he and Nye were close contemporaries in sitcom writing, that Moffat has also been a frequent victim of 'Second Series Syndrome', and that Moffat's wife and mother-in-law are both big cheeses at the aforementioned Hartswood Films.

Nevertheless, Simon Nye isn't the sort of name that your average Doctor Who fan gets excited by - at least not in comparison to some of the other scribes lines up for this new run - and his episode was the least obsessed over pre-transmission by some considerable distance. Which made it all the more satisfying that it turned out to be the most obsessed over post-transmission by some considerable distance. After too many weeks of by-the-book roustabouts that had 'THIS IS WHAT THEY WANT' written across them in such large letters that you half-expected the Phantom Phlan Phlinger to turn up halfway through an episode, Amy's Choice bluntly dispensed with any semblance of tried-and-tested audience pleasing and instead opted for something that seemed to hail from another show entirely. As indicated earlier, the puzzle of which of two realities is the genuine one is hardly an original plot device, but what sets it apart from a mere exercise in emulating Sliding Doors, Jacob's Ladder and that episode of Frasier where Eddie was on opposing sides of the chair is that it uses said hardly original plot device to bring a flash of originality into a show where, by virtue of its sheer longevity alone, it's very difficult to do something that feels 'new'.

Right from the outset, Amy's Choice marks itself out by thrusting The Doctor and Amy not into a superficially 'perfect' scenario that they decided to go snooping around, but into something they really have no control over, and no sense of even where to start getting a sneaking suspicion that something is not quite right. As confidently as The Doctor might claim "there's something out of place, we poke it with a sharp stick", the realities flash by too quickly for them even to find the stick, let alone where they should be poking with it, let alone adjudge its sharpness. Once they do start to get a stick-handle on what's happening to them, along comes the Dream Lord, who reveals the potential ramifications of choosing the wrong reality, and throws a further spanner in the works by splitting them up and leaving the choice entirely down to Amy, whose dilemma is not only over which is real but which of them she wants the most, especially as it involves choosing between having and not having a child. This is one big runaway train of a storyline, in which despite being more or less clued up about what is happening The Doctor is rendered as hapless as his most hapless companion ever (so, Adric then), so far removed from the series' traditional narrative structure that it's tempting to suggest that only a writer at a remove from the show's history, mythology and fanbase would have even thought to take such a structural risk, and even then would probably not have considered it a risk anyway.


The cast – and we’re not just referring to the scene-stealing ‘Guest Goose’ here – rise to the challenge brilliantly. Toby Jones has rightly won praise for his creepy portrayal of The Dream Lord, pitched somewhere between Paranoia from Red Dwarf and Ben Linus from Lost, but it’s Karen Gillan who deserves the lion’s share of the plaudits. Despite having spent the majority of this series reduced to papering over an inconsistent and not always very involved character by flashing her thighs and doing that‘surprised’ face, here she actually has something substantial to work with and it shows both in her increasingly anxious dialogue delivery and in some subtle physical touches, not least the bewildered pats of her stomach on returning to the ‘Not Pregnant’ reality. Meanwhile Matt Smith, on this evidence, appears to be well past the feet-finding stage, clearly relishing the snappy one-liners and the opportunity not to have to provide all of the story exposition himself. Yes, so maybe ‘psychic pollen’ wasn’t exactly the most inventive explanation they could have come up with, and doubtless some viewers were left dissatisfied by The Dream Lord’s unmasking as a bit of The Doctor’s subconscious rather than a new incarnation of The Celestial Toymaker or someone, but everything that came before it was so genuinely thrilling that a couple of basic (but at least logical for once) reveals made no difference.

The positives and negatives of the 'Moffat era' will doubtless start being analysed in great sweary caps lock deluded self-important detail as soon as the series is over; in fact, if Doctor Who fans stay true to their legacy, it's probably started already, and those 'MOFFAT MUST GO!' campaigns will in all likelihood be up and running before this review sees print. If you're one those looking for positives, though, you can't get much more of a positive than a writer who was completely new to Doctor Who - much like Moffat himself way back in series one - showing up all of the competition with a witty, original and fast-paced script. And there are so many other similar writers out there who have proved themselves just as capable in other genres as Simon Nye has, who could do something equally impressive and unpredictable with Doctor Who if given the chance (though let’s leave Richard Curtis out of the equation in future please). If there are two alternate realities facing the show now, let's hope that they opt for the one in which the scriptwriting net is cast even wider. And where, of course, Steven Moffat has slightly different hair.


You can find my huge piece on the entire Russell T. Davies era of Doctor Who in my book Well At Least It's Free, available as a paperback here or as an eBook here.